Campaigns

Introduction and Overview

Billions of people worldwide are malnourished. Food systems transformation is essential to address this challenge, yet it is not happening fast enough. The cost of a healthy diet and food insecurity are instead heading in the wrong direction. Without significant intervention, billions of people will remain unable to access healthy diets and continue to be malnourished. GAIN is dedicated to improving this situation and experienced in designing and delivering high-quality programming, but we often run into challenges that limit our impact. For example, identifying promising areas or populations to target for maximum impact; making decisions with incomplete or low-quality data; localising interventions or content to different populations and contexts; understanding complex food supply chains; or verifying the compliance of partners with fortification standards or other guidelines.

About this Strategy

This strategy is intended to demonstrate how the Global Alliance forImproved Nutrition (GAIN) can harness the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to accelerate impact across our programmes. It offers a practical high-level view for leaders and staff across the organisation to understand where and how AI can add value to our mission of ensuring healthy diets for all, especially the most vulnerable. By clarifying opportunities and limitations, the strategy provides a common framework for experimentation, learning, and responsible adoption of AI.

This strategy sets out how we will integrate AI into our programmes to better achieve our mission: ensuring all people, especially the most vulnerable, have access to healthy diets. Our approach focuses on using AI to design more impactful programmes, deliver them more efficiently, and scale them more rapidly. We will integrate general AI best practices across programmes while adopting specific tools and technologies where they add value.

Our objective is to cultivate an organisational culture where AI is not a technological add-on but a strategic enabler of greater nutrition impact. We also see an opportunity to play a leading role in shaping how AI is applied in food and nutrition programming, contributing thought leadership and demonstrating models that others can adopt and adapt.

Billions of people are still affected by #malnutrition, and despite global efforts, progress remains too slow. #AI offers a powerful opportunity to change that.

From identifying high-impact intervention areas, improving #data  quality, and understanding complex #supplychain , to localising programmes across diverse contexts—AI is reshaping the way we design and deliver #nutrition  solutions.

In this video, Ty Beal highlights how GAIN is strategically applying #artificialintelligence to strengthen programmes, boost efficiency, and accelerate impact for healthier diets worldwide.

Billions of people worldwide are malnourished. Despite our best efforts, the cost of a healthy diet and food insecurity continue heading in the wrong direction. Without significant intervention, this crisis will persist—but we believe artificial intelligence (AI) represents a powerful new tool to help change that trajectory.  

At GAIN, we're no strangers to the challenges that limit our impact: identifying the right populations to target, making decisions with incomplete data, localising interventions across diverse contexts, understanding complex supply chains, and verifying compliance with fortification standards. These obstacles slow our progress toward a world where everyone can access healthy diets.  

Meanwhile, AI adoption has surged from niche experimentation to mainstream deployment. Today, 78% of companies use AI in at least one business function—up from 55% just a year earlier. The development sector has seen transformative technologies before: mobile money and text messaging revolutionised how we deliver resources and information to remote populations. AI represents the next wave of innovation—one we must harness thoughtfully and strategically.

Authors

Overview

The I-CAN Assessment 2025 aims to provide a snapshot into the current state of integration between climate and nutrition action across 16 indicators in policy and finance. Despite modest progress since 2023, the report makes clear that integration of climate and nutrition in key international and national policies and financing remains limited, slowing progress towards both reducing malnutrition and climate goals. 

However, the report also helps to highlight priority areas for action, spotlighting examples of best practice we can learn from as we progress into the second half of this critical decade for the SDGs and climate action.

Bite the Talk Podcast: The Climate & Nutrition Story with Oliver Camp

In this episode of Bite the Talk, Oliver Camp of GAIN about the critical, interconnected challenges and opportunities between climate change and nutrition. He discusses how the Initiative on Climate Action and Nutrition (I-CAN) is working to find "win-win" solutions, urging for better integration of nutrition into climate policies and finance ahead of COP30

 

heat

0°C

It is likely that warming will exceed 1.5°C during the 21st century

food

0M

As many as 673 million people are undernourished

bank note icon

US$0trillion

The impact of malnutrition in all its forms is estimated to be US$3.5 trillion each year

Climate policy commitments rarely consider nutrition

For the 2025 I-CAN assessment report, we have developed a methodology where 4 classification levels are used to determine the degree of integration between climate and nutrition. 

These classification levels are used across a range of indicators (where applicable) and are designed to be action-oriented progressing toward the higher levels.

4 classification levels used throughout analysis to determine the degree of integration between climate and nutrition. These classification levels are used across a range of indicators (where applicable) and are designed to be action-oriented progressing towards the higher levels.Level of integration between climate and nutritionInitiative on Climate Action and Nutrition (I-CAN) No intentional connectedness between climate and nutritionNo linkages between climate and nutrition are foundSome intention to connect climate and nutritionSome analysis into linkages, with the understanding that climate affects nutrition and vice versa, e.g., acknowledging climate change decreases crop yields wich worsens nutritional outcomesIntention to mobilise resources to connect climate and nutritionClear statement that climate-nutrition outcomes should be improved and is an objective, with some context on plans, policies or programmes to target thisCommitment to mobilising resources and with distinct plans to take action to connect climate and nutritionIn-depth plans targeting objectives to improve nutrition and climate, with context on execution .g., funding, timeline, baseline, targets, lead agenciesLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4

Level of climate-nutrition integration in Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) in 2023 (n=166) and 2025 (n=167) 

The September 2025 deadline for NDCs 3.0 was a pivotal opportunity for countries to increase the scope and ambition of their climate action plans – but the majority still show low levels of climate and nutrition integration – 79% of all updated documents score Level 2 or below.

chart2

Level of climate-nutrition integration in National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) in 2023 (n=43) and 2025 (n=63)

National Nutrition Plans (NNPs) and National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) show both greater improvement since 2023 and higher levels of integration compared with mitigation focused strategies such as NDCs.

chart3

 Level of climate-nutrition integration in National Nutrition Plans (NNPs) in 2023 (n=50) and 2025 (n=53)

chart4

Level of climate-nutrition integration in Climate Change Gender Action Plans. (n=16)

Stronger integration at the nexus of gender, nutrition and climate change: ccGAPs showed the greatest climate and nutrition integration across all policy indicators, with 69% scoring at the highest two levels (Level 3 or 4).

Integration of Climate into National Nutrition Plans (NNPs) (% of total, N=50)

Chart 5

Finance Commitment

Only a very minor share of financing provided by bilateral donors and major development banks supports dual climate and nutrition objectives. There remains little consistency in the reporting frameworks used to measure the impact of finance commitments, making it difficult to determine the true volume of finance going to climate- and nutrition-related activities.

Value of Environment-Related ODA (2022–2023 Annual Average)

Chart 7

Number and value of World Bank loans that are climate- and nutrition-supporting

Chart 8

Value of GCF finance in 2024 (total vs. nutrition-related)

Chart 9

Climate Focus Authors

GAIN Authors

Oliver Camp

Resources and Assets

 

 

 

Join the Conversation

 

Contact us

Submit your inquiry and we will contact you

Send us an email

Jessica-colston-headshot